不同稳定咬合板厚度对可复性前移位患者颞下颌关节应力分布影响
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(81860477),江西省重点研发计划(20181ACG70009)


Effects of Different Stabilization Splint Thicknesses on Stress Distribution in Temporomandibular Joint for Patients with Anterior Disc Displacement with Reduction
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 利用三维有限元方法比较双侧颞下颌关节(temporomandibular joint,TMJ)可复性前移位(anterior disc displacement with reduction,ADDwR)患者在佩戴两种不同厚度稳定性咬合板后紧咬时TMJ应力分布改变。方法 根据患者CT、MRI影像数据,依次构建ADDwR患者牙尖交错位(工况1)与戴3、5 mm稳定咬合板咬合(工况2、3)时共3个TMJ有限元模型。分别给予3种工况中的下颌骨施加最大肌力60 s,之后对各工况中关节窝和髁突软骨表面、关节盘表面及双板区的最大等效应力进行评估。结果 各工况左侧TMJ内各结构等效应力均大于右侧。戴3 mm咬合板后,双侧关节盘均未发生复位,关节盘应力仍旧集中在后带及双板区,双侧关节软骨表面应力显著增加;戴5 mm咬合板后,右侧关节盘复位,关节盘最大应力位于中间带,关节软骨和双板区等效应力降低约40%,左侧关节盘未复位,关节窝软骨和双板区等效应力下降约6%。结论 ADDwR患者佩戴不同厚度咬合板,TMJ内应力及其分布模式均发生改变;5 mm稳定性咬合板可以减小ADDwR患者关节窝软骨及双板区表面应力,关节盘复位有利于缓解ADDwR患者TMJ应力。临床为ADDwR患者选择稳定性咬合板治疗时,在保证舒适前提下,较厚的咬合板可以获得更有利的应力分布。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the stress distributions in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) for patients with bilateral anterior disc displacement with reduction (ADDwR) after wearing stabilization splints with two different thicknesses during prolonged clenching by using three-dimensional (3D) finite element methods. Methods The 3D TMJ finite element models were constructed based on CT and MRI image data when the patient was biting in maximum intercuspation (working condition 1), on 3 mm thickness splint (working condition 2) and on 5 mm thickness splint (working condition 3), respectively. The von Mises stresses in the articular cartilages ,the TMJ disc and bilaminar zone under 3 working conditions were evaluated after the maximum jaw-closing forces were applied to the mandible for 60 s. Results The von Mises stress of left TMJ was bigger than that of right TMJ under each working condition. After wearing the 3 mm thickness splint, the disc was not recaptured, the stress was concentrated at the posterior band and bilaminar zone of the disc, and the stress on bilateral TMJ was significantly increased. After wearing the 5 mm thickness splint, the right disc was recaptured, the maximum stress was located at intermediate zone of the disc, and the von Mises stresses of articular cartilages and bilaminar zone were decreased by about 40%. However, the left disc was not recaptured, and the von Mises stresses of glenoid fossa cartilage and bilaminar zone were only slightly decreased by about 6%. Conclusions Different thicknesses of occlusal splints lead to different stresses and stress distribution patterns in TMJ of patients with ADDwR. The 5 mm thickness stabilization splint can reduce the stress of glenoid fossa cartilage and bilaminar zone in ADDwR patients. Disc recapture is helpful for ADDwR patients to relieve TMJ stress. When using stabilization splints for the treatment of ADDwR patients, on the premise of comfort wearing, a thicker splint can achieve more favorable stress distributions.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

鄢梨,王为,邱嘉旋.不同稳定咬合板厚度对可复性前移位患者颞下颌关节应力分布影响[J].医用生物力学,2022,37(2):280-286

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-07
  • 最后修改日期:2021-05-20
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-04-27
  • 出版日期:
关闭